Characterization Unites, Categorization Divides

Characterizations don’t divide, they can be used to unify, like in the business talent endeme set. There are 22 talents. Rather than dividing people into 22 groups, each person has an endeme with all of the talents at various levels, so everyone has a degree of commonality.

Most personality categorization systems divide people into things like the 4 personality types. Systems divide people into four groups. Categorization divides, characterization unites.

The MTBI is sort of a hybrid. it divides people into 16 groups based on 8 possible areas for commonality and gives each person a characterization of four characteristics.

The problem I have had with finding a venue for This Stack is that the net has been so severely subdivided by categorization that there is not a place for generalists like me, or for people talking about general ideas. To solve this we could build a social network based on characterization instead.

Some possible benefits of a Social Network based on Characterization:

  • a place for generalization to bring people together based on shared characteristics/characterizations.
  • Maybe someday include attention management from interest characterizations.
Advertisements

One thought on “Characterization Unites, Categorization Divides

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s